Steam plant · boiler horsepower, steam rate and fuel cost
A laundry is budgeting fuel for its 150 boiler-horsepower firetube, which runs the equivalent of 2,000 hours a season at nameplate. Combustion trims put the seasonal efficiency at 80%, and the gas contract prices delivery at $1.20 per therm.
Given
BHP = 150 hp (boiler) — Nameplate boiler horsepower
η = 80 % — Seasonal efficiency
t = 2000 h — Equivalent full-load hours
p_e = 1.2 $/therm — Contract gas price
Determine
(a)the heat the boiler delivers at nameplate
(b)the steam it produces
(c)the fuel input rate the burner must fire
(d)the fuel energy a season consumes
(e)what the season's gas costs
Step 1 of 5(a) · solve for Heat output
Boiler horsepower is an 1889 ASME unit, not a motor rating: one BHP is 33,475 BTU/h delivered to the water, so 150 BHP is 5.02 million BTU/h — 1.47 MW. Confuse it with the 746 W mechanical horsepower and every number downstream is thirteen times too small.
Rearranged for Q
Q=33,475BHP
Your values, in your units
Q=33,475×(150)
Answer
Q=1.4716MW
Carried onward at full precision, not this rounded figure.
The same definition fixes the steam side: 34.5 lb/h per BHP 'from and at 212 °F', so 150 BHP makes 5,175 lb/h. Real feedwater is colder than 212 °F, so actual steam runs a few percent under this — the 'from and at' figure is the honest comparison basis, not a delivery promise.
Rearranged for S
S=34.5BHP
Your values, in your units
S=34.5×(150)
Answer
S=2.3473t/h
Carried onward at full precision, not this rounded figure.
The meter reads input, not output, so divide by efficiency: 5.02 MBTU/h ÷ 0.80 = 6.28 MBTU/h of gas fired. Dividing — not multiplying — is the step people flip; multiplied, the budget comes in 36% light and the shortfall surfaces in January.
Rearranged for Qin
Q˙in=ηQ˙out
1.4716 MWcarried from step 1
Your values, in your units
Q˙in=(80%)(1,471,580W)
Answer
Q˙in=1.8395MW
Carried onward at full precision, not this rounded figure.
Fire that input for the 2,000 equivalent full-load hours: 6.28 MBTU/h × 2,000 h = 12.55 billion BTU, which the gas bill will call 125,531 therms. Equivalent full-load hours already fold the on-off cycling into one honest number — do not also derate for cycling, that is counting it twice.
Rearranged for W
W=Pt
1.8395 MWcarried from step 3
Your values, in your units
W=(1,839,480W)(2,000h)
Converted to base units
W=(1,839,480W)(7,200,000s)
Answer
W=13.244TJ
Carried onward at full precision, not this rounded figure.
125,531 therms at $1.20 is a $150,638 season. Set it beside the boiler-room payroll and every other line in the budget: the burner tune that bought the 80% — up from a neglected 76% — is worth about $7,500 a season on this one machine.
Rearranged for C_e
Ce=Epe
13.244 TJcarried from step 4
Your values, in your units
Ce=(13,244,200,000,000J)(1.2$/therm)
Converted to base units
Ce=(3,678,960kWh)(0.0409457$/kWh)
Answer
Ce=150,640$
Carried onward at full precision, not this rounded figure.
The 150 BHP boiler delivers 5.02 MBTU/h and about 5,175 lb/h of steam, fires 6.28 MBTU/h of gas at 80% efficiency, and a 2,000-hour season consumes 125,531 therms — roughly $150,638 at $1.20 per therm.
Why this order
This chain is a translation exercise, which is exactly what a steam budget is: the nameplate speaks in boiler horsepower, the operator in pounds of steam, the burner in BTU per hour of input, and the utility in therms and dollars — one machine, four dialects. The pivot is the ASME definition: one boiler horsepower evaporates 34.5 lb/h of water 'from and at 212 °F', and 34.5 lb/h times the 970.3 BTU/lb latent heat at atmospheric pressure is where 33,475 BTU/h comes from — the two nameplate numbers are one fact, which is the cross-check between parts (a) and (b). Output converts to input only through efficiency, and input times hours is the therm count the bill will show. The dollar arithmetic checks exactly in trade units: 33,475 × 150 / 0.8 = 6,276,562.5 BTU/h, × 2,000 h = 12.553 GBTU = 125,531.25 therms, × $1.20 = $150,637.50 — to the cent, because a therm is defined as 100,000 BTU.
The budget-killing mistakes are all one-liners. Treating boiler horsepower as motor horsepower (off by 13.4×). Multiplying by efficiency instead of dividing — a $54,000 error on this plant. Reading '34.5 lb/h per BHP' as a delivery promise when feedwater at 180 °F and steam at 100 psig yield 3–8% less than the 'from and at' basis. And double-derating: equivalent full-load hours already contain the cycling, the night setback and the shoulder seasons, so applying a load factor on top counts the same slack twice and produces a budget nobody can reconcile in March. The one number worth managing rather than calculating is the 80%: it is bought and maintained — combustion trim, stack temperature, blowdown heat recovery — and each point of it is worth about $1,880 a season here.
Carried values move at full precision, not the rounded figure shown — chaining rounded numbers compounds error.