Electrical Resistivity of Carbon Steel

ρsteel=1.6×10−7 Ω⋅m\rho_{\mathrm{steel}} = 1.6 \times 10^{-7}\ \Omega{\cdot}\text{m}
Value1.6e-7 Ω·m
StatusMeasured: ± 4.00e-08 Ω·m (0.25 relative)
SourceASM Handbook, Vol. 1 / CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics
CategoriesMaterial PropertiesEngineering & Trade
Electrical Resistivity of Carbon Steel in every electrical resistivity unit
nanoohm meter160 nΩ·m
ohm circular mil per foot96.244879 Ω·cmil/ft
microohm centimeter16 μΩ·cm
microohm meter0.16 μΩ·m
ohm square millimeter per meter0.16 Ω·mm²/m
milliohm centimeter0.016 mΩ·cm
ohm centimeter0.000016 Ω·cm
ohm meter1.6000000e-07 Ω·m
kiloohm centimeter1.6000000e-08 kΩ·cm
megaohm centimeter1.6000000e-11 MΩ·cm

Learning zone

Steel is a mediocre conductor: an order of magnitude worse than copper, and far more variable, because carbon, manganese and alloying additions all scatter electrons. Values from 1.0 to 2.0 × 10⁻⁷ Ω·m are all legitimately "steel". Stainless is worse still at about 7.2 × 10⁻⁷ Ω·m, roughly 43 times copper.

This is exactly why steel is used where you want resistance and not where you want conduction. Resistance heating elements, induction-heated workpieces and resistance spot welding all exploit it; ACSR transmission cable puts a steel core inside aluminium strands purely for tensile strength and expects it to carry little current. The magnetic complication matters too: steel is ferromagnetic, so at power frequencies skin effect and hysteresis make its effective AC resistance much higher than the DC value — which is why a steel conduit carrying only one phase of a circuit heats up, and why the NEC requires all conductors of a circuit in the same ferrous raceway.