Brunt–Väisälä Frequency from the Potential Temperature Gradient
Also known as Brunt Vaisala frequency · buoyancy frequency · static stability frequency · N squared atmosphere · gravity wave frequency · stable layer oscillation · parcel oscillation period · atmospheric stability frequency · N = sqrt(g/theta dtheta/dz) · mountain wave natural frequency
Worked example: 3 K per km at θ = 300 K → about 0.01 s⁻¹ (typical troposphere, loose). Press Try an example to run it live, then adjust anything.
Enter your known values, leave one input blank, and solves for the missing one. Tap a variable’s symbol to see what it means, with a typical value. Change any unit and the answer follows.
Where Brunt–Väisälä Frequency from the Potential Temperature Gradient fits
Brunt–Väisälä Frequency from the Potential Temperature Gradient explained
A stable layer rings like a spring. Push a parcel of air upward in a layer where the potential temperature rises with height, and it finds itself cooler and denser than its surroundings, so it sinks back, overshoots and bobs up and down. The Brunt-Väisälä frequency is the angular frequency of that bobbing, in radians per second. The formula takes gravity , the mean potential temperature of the layer, and the rise of potential temperature across a layer of depth .
Reading the answer. The stability sits in : the faster potential temperature climbs with height, the stiffer the spring and the larger . Typical values are 0.01 per second in the troposphere, a period of about ten minutes, and twice that in the stratosphere. If the potential temperature falls with height, the layer is unstable and there is no oscillation, because the quantity under the root is negative. Gravity waves and mountain waves ring at this frequency, and the period of the bobbing is .
Worked cases. A rise of 3 K per kilometre at K gives 0.0099 per second, which is about 0.01, the quoted tropospheric value. For an isothermal atmosphere at 250 K a different published expression, , gives 0.0195644 per second. A layer built to match it, with K and a rise of 11.70943 K over 1,000 m (a gradient of 0.0117094 K/m), returns the same value from the formula above, and run backward the formula recovers the 11.709 K rise or the 1,000 m depth.
Where it comes from. The form is given in Emanuel's Atmospheric Convection (1994), and Vallis's Atmospheric and Oceanic Fluid Dynamics (2017) is the other source. The page uses one gradient across the whole layer, so it describes the layer's average stability, not any sharper structure inside it. The potential-temperature page supplies at each level, and the Rossby-number page is the other dimensionless way meteorologists judge whether rotation or buoyancy matters for a flow.
Brunt–Väisälä Frequency from the Potential Temperature Gradient formula
- = Brunt–Väisälä frequency (rad/s)
- = Mean potential temperature (°C)
- = Rise of potential temperature across the layer (K)
- = Depth of the layer (m)
- Vallis, G. K. (2017). Atmospheric and Oceanic Fluid Dynamics (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. Read it
- Emanuel, K. A. (1994). Atmospheric Convection. Oxford University Press (the form N = sqrt((g / θ) dθ/dz)).
Cite this page
formula.expert. (2026, October 30). Brunt–Väisälä Frequency from the Potential Temperature Gradient Calculator. https://formula.expert/solvers/brunt-vaisala-frequency