Heat Exchanger Effectiveness (ε = Q/Qmax)
Also known as epsilon NTU
Enter your known values, leave one input blank, and solves for the missing one. Try different units for next level excitement!
Learning zone
Effectiveness is the one exchanger number a non-specialist can read without a chart: 0.82 means the unit captured 82% of everything thermodynamics allowed. Unlike efficiency in a boiler sense it has no fuel in it, and unlike U it needs no area basis to be meaningful. Typical values: a plate heat exchanger with a close approach runs 0.85–0.95, a shell-and-tube process cooler 0.6–0.8, an air-to-air plate recovery core in an HRV 0.6–0.75, a rotary wheel 0.75–0.85, and a fouled unit somewhere well below where it started.
Its real power is diagnostic. Because ε for a given geometry depends only on NTU and Cr, a drop in measured effectiveness at unchanged flows can only mean UA has fallen — which on a water side means scale or biofilm, and on an air side usually means a plugged coil face. Worked example: an economiser recovering 420 kW where the inlet-to-inlet ceiling is 600 kW runs at ε = 0.70; six months later the same flows return 480 kW against a 750 kW ceiling, ε = 0.64, and the cleaning is overdue. The trap is comparing effectiveness values measured at different flow rates — dropping the flow raises NTU and flatters ε, so an exchanger can look better simply because the pump is throttled.
- = Effectiveness
- = Actual duty
- = Maximum possible duty
- Effectiveness — Effectiveness from NTU (Counterflow), Tons of Refrigeration from BTU/hr
- Actual duty — Radiator Output at Non-Rated Temperature, Heat Exchanger Duty (Q = U·A·F·LMTD)
- Maximum possible duty — Maximum Possible Heat Transfer (Qmax), Heat Exchanger Duty (Q = U·A·F·LMTD)