Delta to Wye Resistance Transformation
Also known as delta-star transform · pi to tee · triangle to star · Kennelly's theorem · Δ-Y conversion
Enter your known values, leave one input blank, and solves for the missing one. Try different units for next level excitement!
Learning zone
Some networks refuse to be reduced. A Wheatstone bridge has no two resistors in plain series and no two in plain parallel, so the usual tools stall. Arthur Kennelly's 1899 transformation is the way out: swap any triangle of three resistors for an electrically identical star, and the series-parallel structure reappears. The arm of the star at node A is the product of the two triangle legs that touch A, divided by the sum of all three.
The balanced case is worth memorising because it is so clean: three equal 30 Ω legs become three equal 10 Ω arms, . For the unbalanced case take a 10/20/30 Ω delta — the sum is 60, so the arm at A, touching the 10 and the 30, is Ω. Every star arm always comes out smaller than either delta leg it touches, which is a useful sanity check on your own arithmetic.
The trap is bookkeeping: it is dangerously easy to pair an arm with the wrong two legs. Label the nodes on the drawing before you start, and remember the rule in words — the arm at a node uses the two legs meeting at that node, and the leg opposite a node never appears in the numerator. Note also that this is a resistance identity, but it works unchanged for complex impedances, which is how three-phase engineers convert a delta-connected load to its wye equivalent before applying per-phase analysis.
- = Wye arm at node A (Ω)
- = Delta leg a-b (Ω)
- = Delta leg b-c (Ω)
- = Delta leg c-a (Ω)
- Wye arm at node A — Wye to Delta Resistance Transformation, Conductor Resistance Temperature Correction
- Delta leg a-b — Wye to Delta Resistance Transformation, Non-Inverting Op-Amp Gain
- Delta leg b-c — Wye to Delta Resistance Transformation, Non-Inverting Op-Amp Gain
- Delta leg c-a — Wye to Delta Resistance Transformation, Non-Inverting Op-Amp Gain