EMF Induced in a Coupled Coil

Also known as mutual induction voltage · M dI dt · transformer action EMF

ε2=MΔI1Δt\varepsilon_{2} = M \frac{\Delta I_{1}}{\Delta t}

Worked example: 200 mH, 4 A in 0.1 s → emf = 8 Vpress Try an example to run it live, then adjust anything.

Enter your known values, leave one input blank, and solves for the missing one. Tap a variable’s symbol to see what it means, with a typical value. Try different units for next level excitement!

Learning zone

This is Faraday's law with the changing flux supplied by a neighbour. A current I1I_1 in the first coil makes flux; some fraction of that flux threads the second coil; change I1I_1 and the flux through coil 2 changes, so a voltage appears across coil 2 whether or not it is connected to anything. All the geometry — turns, core, spacing, alignment — is bundled into the single number MM, which leaves ε2=MdI1/dt\varepsilon_2 = -M\,dI_1/dt: the induced voltage depends on how fast the primary current changes, and on nothing about its size.

A pair with M=200 mHM = 200\ \text{mH}, with the primary current swinging 4 A in 0.1 s, induces 0.2×40=8 V0.2 \times 40 = 8\ \text{V}. Now interrupt that same current in 1 µs instead, as a relay contact opening does: dI/dtdI/dt is 4×1064 \times 10^6 A/s and the induced voltage is 800 kV — which of course never appears, because the air arcs over long before. That inequality is the whole reason for flyback diodes, snubbers and contact-suppression networks.

The minus sign is Lenz's law, and it is a conservation statement rather than a bookkeeping one: the induced voltage drives a current whose own field opposes the change that created it. If it did not, the induced current would reinforce the change, which would induce more current, and you would have a machine that made energy from nothing. This page uses the magnitude form and drops the sign, so read the answer as a size and take the polarity from the winding sense and the dot convention on the schematic.

Two limits deserve stating. The ΔI/Δt\Delta I/\Delta t written here is an average over the interval, and it equals the instantaneous dI/dtdI/dt only for a linear ramp; feed it a sine wave over half a cycle and you get the average slope, not the peak, which is π/2\pi/2 times higher. And MM is only constant while the magnetic circuit is: drive a core into saturation and MM collapses, which is why the induced voltage in a real transformer stops following this equation exactly where the designer stopped wanting it to. Finally, mutual induction is not always a component — it is the mechanism of crosstalk between cables, of the noise a contactor coil injects into a signal pair beside it, and of every current transformer ever fitted.

EMF Induced in a Coupled Coil
ε2=MΔI1Δt\varepsilon_{2} = M \frac{\Delta I_{1}}{\Delta t}
Where
  • ε2\varepsilon_{2}= Induced EMF in coil 2 (V)
  • MM= Mutual inductance (mH)
  • ΔI1\Delta I_{1}= Current change in coil 1 (A)
  • Δt\Delta t= Time interval (s)
Missing one of these? Work it out first, then come back