Two Resistors in Series

Also known as series resistance

Rt=R1+R2R_{t} = R_{1} + R_{2}

Worked example: 220 Ω + 330 Ω in series → 550 Ω — press Try an example to run it live, then adjust anything.

Enter your known values, leave one input blank, and solves for the missing one. Tap a variable’s symbol to see what it means, with a typical value. Try different units for next level excitement!

Here the solver did the work — could you?

Series Circuits →

Grade 10Grade 10 Science

Series and parallel →

Grade 11Grade 11 Physics

Series and parallel →

UniversityCircuits & Electrical Power

Test your skills in the Exam Room: new numbers every attempt — free lessons for students, no sign-up, just pure learning. Find 3 more lessons on this formula.

See your Report Card
Compete with your friends
share your results
Learning zone

Two Resistors in Series explained

R1R2Rt

Two resistors wired end to end sit on one path, and that single fact settles everything else. Charge has nowhere to go but forward, so the same current passes through both — it is not divided between them and it is not shared out according to size. Each resistor then takes its own voltage drop, V1=IR1V_1 = I R_1 and V2=IR2V_2 = I R_2, and the two drops must add up to whatever the supply provides. Divide that sum by the current they have in common and the resistances add: Rt=R1+R2R_t = R_1 + R_2. This is not a rule to memorise. It is Ohm's law applied twice in a circuit that has only one loop.

Put a 47 Ω resistor in series with a 220 Ω resistor across a 12 V supply. The total is 267 Ω, so the current is 12/267=45 mA12/267 = 45\ \text{mA}, and it is 45 mA at every point in the loop — before the first resistor, between them, and after the second. The 47 Ω part drops 0.045×47=2.1 V0.045 \times 47 = 2.1\ \text{V}; the 220 Ω part drops 0.045×220=9.9 V0.045 \times 220 = 9.9\ \text{V}; and 2.1 + 9.9 gives back the 12 V we started with. Adding the drops as a check costs nothing and catches most arithmetic errors on the spot.

The bookkeeping behind that check is Kirchhoff's voltage law, published by Gustav Kirchhoff in 1845 while he was still a student: go once around any closed loop and the voltage rises equal the voltage falls, because the loop returns you to the potential you started at. Every series result descends from it. The voltage divider is the same equation rearranged — each resistor claims the fraction R1/(Rt)R_1/(R_t) of the supply — and that is how a potentiometer, a thermistor bridge and a sensor's biasing network all work. Solving this page backwards for one resistor is subtraction, R1=Rt−R2R_1 = R_t - R_2, which is why the total must exceed the branch you already know.

The mistakes cluster in three places. The first is reaching for the wrong combination rule: series resistors add, parallel resistors combine as product over sum, and capacitors do exactly the reverse — series capacitors are the reciprocal case. Whenever you find yourself using product-over-sum on a series string, stop and ask which component you are holding. The second is assuming the larger resistor gets the larger current; it gets the larger voltage drop at the same current, and confusing those two makes a mess of any divider. The third only appears on AC: a coil or a capacitor in series with a resistor cannot be added arithmetically to it. Reactance is 90° out of phase with resistance, so a 30 Ω resistor in series with 40 Ω of reactance presents 302+402=50 Ω\sqrt{30^2 + 40^2} = 50\ \Omega, not 70. This page adds resistances, and resistances are what it will add — the quadrature sum belongs on the impedance pages.

Two Resistors in Series formula

Rt=R1+R2R_{t} = R_{1} + R_{2}
Where
  • RtR_{t}= Total resistance (Ω)
  • R1R_{1}= Resistance 1 (Ω)
  • R2R_{2}= Resistance 2 (Ω)

Missing one of these? Work it out first, then come back