SPT Overburden Correction (Liao–Whitman)
Enter your known values, leave one input blank, and solves for the missing one. Try different units for next level excitement!
Learning zone
The standard penetration test counts the hammer blows needed to drive a split-spoon sampler 300 mm, and the same sand gives a higher count deeper down simply because it is confined more tightly. To compare one borehole with another — or with the liquefaction databases — the count must be normalised to a reference overburden of one atmosphere, and Liao and Whitman's 1986 factor C_N = √(p_a/σ′v) is the form the codes adopted. A field N₆₀ of 20 at an effective overburden of 150 kPa becomes (N₁)₆₀ = 20 × √(100/150) = 20 × 0.816 = 16.3.
The trap is doing this before the energy correction. Raw field N must first be corrected to 60% of the theoretical hammer energy — a safety hammer on a rope-and-cathead is around 60%, an old pinweight hammer nearer 45%, a modern automatic trip hammer 80–90% — plus rod length, borehole diameter and liner corrections. Skipping that and applying C_N to a raw N is the single most common misuse of the SPT. The second trap is shallow depth: at σ′v below about 25 kPa the square root inflates C_N past 1.7, and most standards cap it at about 2. Note too that σ′v is the effective stress, so below the water table you use the buoyant unit weight.
- = Corrected blow count
- = Field blow count at 60% energy
- = Reference stress (1 atm)
- = Effective vertical stress at the test
- Corrected blow count — Chi-Square Contribution of One Cell, Pulley System Effort Force
- Field blow count at 60% energy — Pulley System Effort Force, Gear Ratio
- Reference stress (1 atm) — Effective Stress (Terzaghi, σ′ = σ − u), Total Vertical Stress (σ = γz)
- Effective vertical stress at the test — Total Vertical Stress (σ = γz), Effective Stress (Terzaghi, σ′ = σ − u)