Thermal Conductivity of Water

kw=0.598 W/(m⋅K)k_{w} = 0.598\ \text{W/(m}{\cdot}\text{K)}
Value0.598 W/(m·K)
StatusMeasured: ± 0.003 W/(m·K) (0.005 relative)
SourceIAPWS / CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 104th ed.
CategoriesMaterial PropertiesEngineering & Trade
Thermal Conductivity of Water in every thermal conductivity unit
milliwatt per meter-kelvin598 mW/(m·K)
BTU inch per hour square foot Fahrenheit4.1462161 BTU·in/(h·ft²·°F)
watt per meter-kelvin0.598 W/(m·K)
watt per meter-Celsius0.598 W/(m·°C)
kilocalorie per hour meter Celsius0.51453155 kcal/(h·m·°C)
BTU per hour-foot-Fahrenheit0.34551801 BTU/(h·ft·°F)
watt per centimeter-kelvin0.00598 W/(cm·K)
calorie per second centimeter Celsius0.0014292543 cal/(s·cm·°C)
kilowatt per meter-kelvin0.000598 kW/(m·K)

Learning zone

Water conducts heat better than most liquids — roughly four times better than mineral oil and 25 times better than air — thanks to hydrogen bonding, and unusually it improves as it warms, peaking near 0.68 W/(m·K) at about 130 °C before declining. It is one of the terms in the Prandtl number and therefore in every convective correlation for water-side film coefficients.

The distinction that trips people up is conduction versus convection. Still water is a mediocre insulator, but water moving through a tube transfers heat by convection at film coefficients of thousands of W/(m²·K) — the conductivity only enters through the correlation. Adding glycol makes this worse twice over: a 50 % propylene-glycol mix has conductivity near 0.40 W/(m·K) and roughly triple the viscosity at low temperature, which is why glycol loops need larger pumps and more heat-transfer surface for the same duty.