Dittus-Boelter Correlation

Also known as turbulent tube nusselt correlation

Nu=0.023 Re0.8 Prn\mathrm{Nu} = 0.023 \, \mathrm{Re}^{0.8} \, \mathrm{Pr}^{n}

Units aren’t used in this calculation: every value is a plain number.

sig figs

Worked example: Re 50,000, Pr 4.5, heating → Nu 241.1. Press Try an example to run it live, then adjust anything.

Enter your known values, leave one input blank, and solves for the missing one. Tap a variable’s symbol to see what it means, with a typical value.

Where Dittus-Boelter Correlation fits

Missing an input?

See also

Graetz Number: Both use Reynolds number and Prandtl number.Nusselt Number: Both use Nusselt number.Prandtl Number: Both use Prandtl number.Rayleigh Number: Both use Prandtl number.Colebrook–White Friction Factor: Both use Reynolds number.Laminar Friction Factor (f = 64/Re): Both use Reynolds number.
2 more relatedReynolds Number: Both use Reynolds number.Swamee–Jain Friction Factor: Both use Reynolds number.
Here the solver did the work. Could you?

Dittus–Boelter →

UniversityThermodynamics & Heat Transfer

Test your skills in the Exam Room: new numbers every attempt. Free lessons for students, no sign-up, just pure learning.

See your Report Card
Learning zone

Dittus-Boelter Correlation explained

ReNunPr

Published by F. W. Dittus and L. M. K. Boelter at Berkeley in 1930 (in a university engineering bulletin, not a journal) this is the most-used correlation in heat transfer, and it is deliberately crude. It fits fully developed turbulent flow inside a smooth circular tube, with the stated validity range: Re > 10,000, 0.6 < Pr < 160, and length-to-diameter ratio above about 10 so the entrance region has stopped mattering. Properties are taken at the bulk mean temperature, and the exponent n switches between 0.4 when the fluid is being heated and 0.3 when it is being cooled, which crudely accounts for the way viscosity near the wall changes the velocity profile.

Expect ±25% scatter against experiment, and worse if the wall-to-bulk temperature difference is large or the fluid is very viscous: for those cases Sieder-Tate adds a (μ/μwall)0.14(\mu/\mu_{\mathrm{wall}})^{0.14} factor, and Gnielinski's 1976 correlation does far better across the transition region. Worked example: Re = 50,000, Pr = 4.5, heating, gives Nu=0.023×50,0000.8×4.50.4=0.023×5743×1.825=241\mathrm{Nu} = 0.023 \times 50{,}000^{0.8} \times 4.5^{0.4} = 0.023 \times 5743 \times 1.825 = 241, which in water inside a 25 mm tube is h ≈ 5800 W/(m²·K). The trap worth remembering is the exponent on Re: 0.8 means doubling the velocity buys only 74% more coefficient while the pressure drop rises about fourfold, so there is always a point beyond which pumping the tubes harder is a losing trade.

Dittus-Boelter Correlation formula

Nu=0.023 Re0.8 Prn\mathrm{Nu} = 0.023 \, \mathrm{Re}^{0.8} \, \mathrm{Pr}^{n}
Where
  • Nu\mathrm{Nu}= Nusselt number
  • Re\mathrm{Re}= Reynolds number
  • Pr\mathrm{Pr}= Prandtl number
  • nn= Prandtl exponent
Revised 31 October 2026
Cite this page

formula.expert. (2026, October 31). Dittus-Boelter Correlation Formula & Calculator. https://formula.expert/solvers/dittus-boelter-correlation