Particles from Moles (Avogadro's Number)

Also known as avogadro's number · atoms from moles

N=n NAN = n\,N_A

Worked example: 2 mol → 1.204428152e24 particles — press Try an example to run it live, then adjust anything.

Enter your known values, leave one input blank, and solves for the missing one. Tap a variable’s symbol to see what it means, with a typical value. Try different units for next level excitement!

Here the solver did the work — could you?

Counting particles →

Grade 11Grade 11 Chemistry

Counting particles →

Grade 12Grade 12 Chemistry

The mole machine →

UniversityProcess & Water Chemistry

Test your skills in the Exam Room: new numbers every attempt — free lessons for students, no sign-up, just pure learning. Find 2 more lessons on this formula.

See your Report Card
Compete with your friends
share your results
Learning zone

Particles from Moles (Avogadro's Number) explained

nN

A mole is a count and nothing more mysterious — the chemist's dozen, scaled up to something useful. Multiply an amount in moles by the Avogadro constant and you have the literal number of particles in front of you. The only real question is why the constant is that particular size, and the answer is that it was chosen to make the bridge between two worlds land cleanly: NAN_A is the number of atoms that makes a mole of carbon-12 weigh exactly 12 grams. That choice is what lets a mass in grams read off a balance be converted into a count of atoms, which is the single most useful trick in chemistry.

Scale is the thing worth feeling here. A 250 g glass of water is 250/18.015 = 13.9 mol, so it holds 13.9×6.022×1023=8.4×102413.9 \times 6.022\times10^{23} = 8.4\times10^{24} molecules. Now count the other way: all the water on Earth, about 1.4×10211.4\times10^{21} litres, divided into 250 g glasses, comes to roughly 5.4×10215.4\times10^{21} glasses. There are about fifteen hundred times more molecules in one glass of water than there are glasses of water in every ocean on the planet. That ratio is why chemists never think about individual molecules and why statistical behaviour is so reliable at this scale.

The constant carries Avogadro's name but not his arithmetic — he proposed in 1811 that equal gas volumes hold equal numbers of particles, and never estimated the number. Jean Perrin did, from Brownian motion, and named it for Avogadro in 1909, work that took him the 1926 Nobel Prize. The 2019 SI redefinition then reversed the logic entirely. NAN_A is now exact by decree at 6.02214076 × 10²³ per mole, and the mole is defined as that many entities. Carbon-12's role is retired: a mole of it now weighs 12 grams only to within experimental uncertainty, rather than by definition. So 2.00 mol contains exactly 1.204428152 × 10²⁴ particles, with no uncertainty in the constant at all — though your measured 2.00 mol still has its own.

The error that swallows this page whole is leaving "particles of what" unstated. A mole of O₂ is 6.022 × 10²³ molecules but 1.204 × 10²⁴ atoms. A mole of NaCl is 6.022 × 10²³ formula units, which is 6.022 × 10²³ sodium ions plus the same number of chloride ions — 1.204 × 10²⁴ ions in total. A mole of Al₂(SO₄)₃ contains three moles of sulfate. Almost every wrong answer here is a correct calculation attached to the wrong noun, so write the noun down before you multiply: molecules, atoms, ions, or formula units.

Two smaller slips. Dividing a molar mass by NAN_A gives the mass of one particle in grams — water comes out at 2.99×10−232.99\times10^{-23} g — and people routinely lose a factor of 1000 by mixing kilograms into that step, or confuse it with the mass in unified atomic mass units, which is just the molar mass number again with different units. And because NAN_A is exact, it never limits your significant figures; only the amount you measured does.

Particles from Moles (Avogadro's Number) formula

N=n NAN = n\,N_A
Where
  • NN= Number of particles
  • nn= Amount of substance (mol)

Missing one of these? Work it out first, then come back