formula.expert

Relative Compaction (Percent Proctor)

Also known as percent proctor · compaction test

R=γd,fieldγd,max×100R = \frac{\gamma_{d,field}}{\gamma_{d,max}}\times 100

Enter your known values, leave one input blank, and solves for the missing one. Try different units for next level excitement!

Learning zone

Every earthwork specification in the world is written as a percentage of Proctor: 95% standard Proctor under a road embankment, 98% modified under a structural pad. The reference is the peak of the compaction curve Ralph Proctor published in 1933, and the field number comes from a sand cone, a rubber balloon or a nuclear gauge. A fill placed at 17.8 kN/m³ against an 18.9 kN/m³ maximum is 17.8 ÷ 18.9 × 100 = 94.2% — a failing test on a 95% spec, and a truck goes back over it. In imperial work a 95% requirement on a 118 pcf Proctor means at least 0.95 × 118 = 112.1 pcf in the ground.

The trap is which Proctor. Standard (ASTM D698, 12 400 ft·lbf/ft³) and modified (D1557, 56 250 ft·lbf/ft³) give maximum dry densities that can differ by 10 pcf or more, so 95% of the wrong one is a different fill entirely. The second trap is the "wrong Proctor curve": one maximum belongs to one material, and the moment the borrow pit changes soil, the reference curve must too — the classic dispute where a contractor is failing tests on a perfectly good silt because the file curve came from the sand next door. Values above 100% are common and legitimate, not an error.

Relative Compaction (Percent Proctor)
R=γd,fieldγd,max×100R = \frac{\gamma_{d,field}}{\gamma_{d,max}}\times 100
Where
  • RR= Relative compaction
  • γd,field\gamma_{d,field}= Field dry unit weight
  • γd,max\gamma_{d,max}= Maximum dry unit weight
Missing one of these? Work it out first, then come back