Classical electron radius
| Value | 2.8179403205e-15 m |
| Status | Measured: ± 1.30e-24 m (4.6e-10 relative) |
| Source | CODATA 2022 |
| Categories | Universal & Atomicphysicsatomic |
| femtometer | 2.8179403 fm |
| picometer | 0.0028179403 pm |
| nanometer | 0.0000028179403 nm |
| micrometer | 2.8179403e-09 μm |
| millimeter | 2.8179403e-12 mm |
| centimeter | 2.8179403e-13 cm |
| decimeter | 2.8179403e-14 dm |
| meter | 2.8179403e-15 m |
| kilometer | 2.8179403e-18 km |
| inch | 1.1094253e-13 in |
| foot | 9.2452110e-15 ft |
| yard | 3.0817370e-15 yd |
| mile | 1.7509869e-18 mi |
| nautical mile | 1.5215660e-18 nmi |
| astronomical unit | 1.8836768e-26 AU |
| light-year | 2.9785653e-31 ly |
| parsec | 9.1323226e-32 pc |
Learning zone
Set the electrostatic self-energy of a uniformly charged sphere equal to m_e c² and you get r_e, a leftover from Lorentz's pre-quantum electron models. It is emphatically not the size of the electron: scattering experiments show the electron is pointlike down to below 10⁻¹⁸ m, a thousand times smaller, and the Standard Model treats it as having no extent at all.
The number survives because it is the natural amplitude for a photon to scatter off a free charge. The Thomson cross section is (8π/3)r_e², the classical radiated power from an accelerating electron carries r_e, and X-ray scattering factors are quoted in units of r_e — so synchrotron and crystallography software is full of it. That it coincidentally equals about 2.8 fm, close to a nuclear radius, is pure numerical accident with no physical content.