Absolute Roughness of Drawn Tubing and Plastic Pipe

ϵtube=0.0000015 m\epsilon_{\mathrm{tube}} = 0.0000015\ \text{m}
Value0.0000015 m
StatusMeasured: ± 0.000001 m (0.67 relative)
SourceCrane TP-410 / Moody (1944)
CategoriesMaterial PropertiesEngineering & Tradefluids
ε_tube in every length unit
femtometer1,500,000,000 fm
picometer1,500,000 pm
nanometer1,500 nm
micrometer1.5 μm
millimeter0.0015 mm
centimeter0.00015 cm
decimeter0.000015 dm
meter0.0000015 m
kilometer1.5000000e-09 km
inch0.000059055118 in
foot0.0000049212598 ft
yard0.0000016404199 yd
mile9.3205679e-10 mi
nautical mile8.0993521e-10 nmi
astronomical unit1.0026881e-17 AU
light-year1.5855013e-22 ly
parsec4.8611689e-23 pc

Learning zone

Drawn copper, PVC, PE and glass are hydraulically smooth for most practical Reynolds numbers, with ε near 0.0015 mm. In the smooth regime the friction factor stops depending on roughness at all and follows the Prandtl or Blasius relation on Reynolds number alone — which is why the Moody chart's curves converge at the bottom left.

Do not over-claim the benefit. Because friction factor varies with the logarithm of ε/D, going from steel to copper at the same diameter typically saves only 10–20 % of straight-run friction loss, and in a real system fittings, valves and the coil or exchanger usually dominate anyway. The genuinely useful implication is different: smooth pipes hold their performance, while steel degrades with age. Also note that plastic pipe of the same nominal size often has a different inside diameter than steel — CPVC and PEX in particular have notably smaller bores than copper of the same nominal size — and that diameter change swamps the roughness advantage entirely.